- Have each other at a distance we can control - The Goldilocks Effect
- We only pay attention to what we want to in a presentation, and never get to hear what we don't want to hear, this is a problem
- Conversations problem - we can't control what we want to say, we edit ourselves, we are just right, not too much, not too little
- Cleaning up relationships with technology
- Good for connection but not for really understanding each other
- Facebook makes up for feeling like no one is listening to me
- We're developing social robots for the elderly (robodog)
- We're lonely, but we are afraid of intimacy
- I share therefor I am
- Not suggesting to turn away from the devices, just make room for other stuff
I don't think 'natural' is good. There are many things that we apply (some almost arbitrary) (some ignorant and backward ideas of natural and not-natural agenda-propagating) rules of morality. I think 'natural' is a political rhetoric, profoundly abused. 'Diversity' is the only defensible rhetoric for 'thinking' beings. We are not, of course, the only creatures that do thinking, but we are the only creatures with the power to oppress others and other creatures whose languages we don't understand. Us (badly) thinking creatures, slowly, ponderously gathering the evidence of our badness (I see no reason for your (god's) patience with us), have the ability to decide to be better than (the fashionable) 'natural' of the day. It is our responsibility to transcend our vileness. Just that. That one task. Our thinkingness I believe is for that. A world (constructed by god) to demonstrate this point. And we will find every rhetor...
Comments