- sex ed to start from age 5 - not to say show them a porn movie, but start introducing notions
- doesn't make kids have more sex
- makes them more likely to use condoms when they do
- by taking opportunities to address sexuality out of the public sphere it puts the onus on parents to guide their children's sex decision making
- often children aren't even thinking sex when we think they are thinking sex - Sexpo billboard - often our reactions put things in their minds
- SOLUTION FROM LISTENER: teach kids how to be parents before you teach them about sex
- the consequences of sex is not pregnancy it is pleasure, fear tactics don't work
- don't just talk to children about sex, talk about relationships, love, age-appropriate sex (underage sex could land you in jail), guidance about how loving should happen, HIV education
- no guilt tripping, no coercion
- if they do something 'wrong' sexually, work through it with them so that they know how to do it better, no punishment
- (! recognise that a mistake your kids make is a mistake you, the parent or adult, made)
I don't think 'natural' is good. There are many things that we apply (some almost arbitrary) (some ignorant and backward ideas of natural and not-natural agenda-propagating) rules of morality. I think 'natural' is a political rhetoric, profoundly abused. 'Diversity' is the only defensible rhetoric for 'thinking' beings. We are not, of course, the only creatures that do thinking, but we are the only creatures with the power to oppress others and other creatures whose languages we don't understand. Us (badly) thinking creatures, slowly, ponderously gathering the evidence of our badness (I see no reason for your (god's) patience with us), have the ability to decide to be better than (the fashionable) 'natural' of the day. It is our responsibility to transcend our vileness. Just that. That one task. Our thinkingness I believe is for that. A world (constructed by god) to demonstrate this point. And we will find every rhetor...
Comments