- Martin Luther King - I can never be what I ought to be until you are what you ought to be
- Mother Theresa - The problem with the world is that we draw the circle of the family to small
- We give too much voice to the most divisive amongst us
- Book titles reflect this - Pinheads and patriots; Arguing with idiots
- Negative otherizing morphs into violent extremism
- Counteracting otherizing A strategy: Take the other to lunch
- Agree on some ground rules - ahead of time
- Be conversational, don't persuade, interrupt, be curious, listen, be real, don't try to change the other side, acknowledge that it's a first step
- What issues concern you, what have you always wanted to ask someone from the other side
- Two people dropping the pretence of being know it alls
- Two people practicing ubuntu
I don't think 'natural' is good. There are many things that we apply (some almost arbitrary) (some ignorant and backward ideas of natural and not-natural agenda-propagating) rules of morality. I think 'natural' is a political rhetoric, profoundly abused. 'Diversity' is the only defensible rhetoric for 'thinking' beings. We are not, of course, the only creatures that do thinking, but we are the only creatures with the power to oppress others and other creatures whose languages we don't understand. Us (badly) thinking creatures, slowly, ponderously gathering the evidence of our badness (I see no reason for your (god's) patience with us), have the ability to decide to be better than (the fashionable) 'natural' of the day. It is our responsibility to transcend our vileness. Just that. That one task. Our thinkingness I believe is for that. A world (constructed by god) to demonstrate this point. And we will find every rhetor...
Comments