Just because a guy wants to fuck you doesn't necessarily mean he likes you. If he says he loves you, it doesn't necessarily mean he likes you. If he marries you, it doesn't necessarily mean he likes you. If you are confused about how he feels about you, if the slightest doubt exists in your mind about whether or not he likes you ~ he doesn't like you. Older guys that come onto younger girls are too immature to attract mature (sorted) women. Or they are paedophiles. Guys who want to fuck models are into pre-pubesent boys (consider the similarity in body shape). Nobody tells young guys about the clit, you must. The only way to make sure you have the pick of good relationships is to make sure that you are funny, intelligent and warm ~ if someone wants something other than that they haven't worked out what is important yet, dump 'em. Men won't wear condoms unless you force them, can you? You have just as much right to express your sexuality AS YOU WANT TO as everybody else.
I don't think 'natural' is good. There are many things that we apply (some almost arbitrary) (some ignorant and backward ideas of natural and not-natural agenda-propagating) rules of morality. I think 'natural' is a political rhetoric, profoundly abused. 'Diversity' is the only defensible rhetoric for 'thinking' beings. We are not, of course, the only creatures that do thinking, but we are the only creatures with the power to oppress others and other creatures whose languages we don't understand. Us (badly) thinking creatures, slowly, ponderously gathering the evidence of our badness (I see no reason for your (god's) patience with us), have the ability to decide to be better than (the fashionable) 'natural' of the day. It is our responsibility to transcend our vileness. Just that. That one task. Our thinkingness I believe is for that. A world (constructed by god) to demonstrate this point. And we will find every rhetor...
Comments