Skip to main content

Mary Daly explains the pejoration (of one) of the words related to women

Of Death and Conscience: Brief thoughts on gender role and the values of the dominant culture in medicine: "“Under the influence of the Church and the newly formed male-dominated medical establishment, the word “witch,” which originally meant “wise one,” became a term of scorn. It took a reign of terror lasting several hundred years to radically alter a way of life thousands of years old. Millions of women who carried the healing lineage were systematically killed (see The Church and the Second Sex by Mary Daly).”"

Comments

Johannes said…
Which witch ...
"witch" originally meant "wise one"? I'd like to see the source!

Keep in mind, the church had existed for 1450 years before conspiracy theories began preying on the medieval mind. After all, someone had to be responsible for the black plague.

The number of those executed has also since been established to be around 50 000 during the next 3 centuries. But while the balance of power certainly tipped the panic mostly against women, many men were also burned; in France, more men than women. [http://www.gendercide.org/case_witchhunts.html]

There was an undeniable and unforgivable gendercide as evil as the holocaust. But while the victims were certainly not always plotting "to destroy the Christian kingdoms through magick and poison", they were also often not just female healers.

(I'm a believer that best backlash is a BETTER backlash!)
Tanya Pretorius said…
I have checked the sources of both items, against my will, and feel confident that I can accept both. My 'verstand' tells me so. (My 'mind' is so different from my 'verstand' that I rarely trust it.)

I don't do the 'your source is bigger (or better) than mine' thing though. I am comfortable with you choosing reasons and things to believe that are different from mine. You believe in 'the truth is so compelling, you have to believe it'. I believe in 'truths are permeable'.  

You are the one who believes that 'facts' and 'truth' are better. I haven't found them to be stable and reliable, and much prefer to look with my 'vestand'. It's not always right, but it's the way that works for me. 

Your skepticism works for you and me. Everyone in fact. You are the Checker, and without you, huge vacuums of unchecked facts may turn into black holes of unchecked facts. 

Thanks for questioning, it lead me on a Fantastic Journey. I have been in nooks and crannies of history that I would never have gone into in my passive acceptance of both of those tidbits. And I have learned and articulated things about myself I would never have had access to without your skepticism. Thanks for the birds-eye view. 
Tanya Pretorius said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Tanya Pretorius said…
Ironically, I then went off to read this entry in Faultline, and it's amazing how many flavors of blood can be drawn from a stone! This leapfrog was poetry.

http://faultline.org/index.php/site/item/incendiary/

Popular posts from this blog

VHEMT (Vehement) is a anti-procreation movement

"Here's a novel idea to save the planet: Remove the main cause of its woes - homo sapiens. The Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (VHEMT - pronounced "vehement") proposes the phasing out the human race. "When every human chooses to stop breeding, Earth's biosphere will be allowed to return to its former glory, and all remaining creatures will be free to live, die, and evolve (if they believe in evolution)," offers the movement's website. But 'it's going to take all of us going'." See www.vhemt.org SOURCE: Email invite. I thought I was the only one who thought like this. Everyone I know thanks the universe that I didn't study microbiology. I would have developed a human-specific killer virus. WE are the vermin.

Richard Dawkins on militant atheism

Dawkins has become outspoken in his atheism , coining the word "bright" (as an alternate to atheist), and encouraging fellow non-believers to stand up and be identified. intelligent design is creationism redressed creationists are right that evolution is hostile to evolution statistical improbability of the complexity of design - intelligent design but the intelligent designer wouldn't have made such a hash - why would the designer be bothered with disapproving of our sex lives, favor our side in the war Dawkins suggest rocking the boat - attack religion as a whole taboo of speaking ill about religion - Douglas Adams said, sacred ideas at the heart of religion, holy cows, you can support any operating system you want, but the challenge of religious ideas is off limits science and religion are corrosive to each other - religious explanations are trivial and improbably, teaches people to accept authoritarianism takes the example of famous scientists and imagines